31 March 2006

失而復得

一如以往,晚上叫外賣。
這種服務,確實解決了很多「無飯夫婦」的生活問題。雖然飯菜送來的時候,大都已失去了應有的新鮮,但針沒兩頭利,既然得到了隨叫隨到的方便,也就應接受味覺暫時性的失調。
外賣我可謂專家。由快餐到到會,由日本壽司到意大利薄餅,由老火湯到礦泉水,林林總總,形形色色,雖未算得上是日新月異,但總算是多姿多采。
快餐?若非逼不得已,就可免則免。既然是快餐,故名思義就是只求速度不求味道。一家著名的炸雞店,也提供外賣服務。可是,外賣跟堂食,卻有天淵之別。
老火湯呢?飯菜一般,服務則強差人意。說明是老火湯,但火候久奉。而送貨速度,實在難以要人接受。送來的冷飯菜汁,避之則吉。
但今天晚上所選擇的意大利外賣,卻教我喜出望外。
我沒有點傳統的薄餅,卻叫了別的,另加兩罐飲料。誰知送來時少了一罐,送貨員連忙禮貌地道歉,還應承一會補送。既然錯已認,再奉上修補方法,夫復何求?
時光荏苒,門鐘響起。
送上的,竟不是一罐,而是兩罐。
關上門後,我目瞪口呆。
真不敢相信,現在竟然還有這麼在乎你感受的外賣服務公司。
就因為這種「少許諾多兌現」的服務態度,我會是這家公司忠誠客戶,絕不反悔。

打開信箱

小時候,沒啥玩意,但對異性卻特別好奇,為解心癢,便交上幾位筆友。由於用詞恰當,再加上一種寧濫勿缺的心態,信箱裡每隔數天,便有驚喜。
紙上談情的關係始終不能長久。而人,也總得在跌跌碰碰中長大。歲月不留人,一晃眼,已是科技年代。
事過境遷,是千古不變的定律。信箱放滿的,已不是天長地久的情書,而是無情的繳費通知書,及一大堆一廂情願的廣告傳單。
既來之,則安之。不能逃避的,終得要接受,付款去。逃避的,可免則免,揮之則去。遺憾的是落花有意隨流水,而流水無心戀落花。
廣告單張依舊是天天有,更有有增無減之勢!
就是這樣,每收到諸如此類的單張,馬上棄置於垃圾桶內。垃圾郵件之名,也就因此而生。
時光荏苒,如是者又過了數年。
直至一天,信箱裡出現了它—車位租賃單張。
雖然設計簡單,印刷粗糙,但它找對了對象。有云不管黑貓、白貓,只要捉到老鼠就是好貓。也管不了它的包裝封面,信息合意便行。
撥上電話,跟車位主人聊了一會,每月便省了幾百塊,是一滿缸的油費。
剎那的包裝不是永恆,到最後,還是需要迎合目標受眾的要求,才能達致雙贏局面。
空泛的體驗如乾涸的愛情,難以持久。反而平凡踏實的感覺能細水長流,甜在心頭。

國恥

「床前明月光,疑是地上霜,舉頭望明月,低頭思故鄉。」
現代人都是善忘的。小時候耳熟能詳的一首詩,長大後也許都忘了其意義。令大部份人牽腸掛肚的,都是些男歡女愛、山盟海誓、同性相拒、異性相吸、假情假意、不知所謂的鎖碎事。
思鄉愛國之情,已變得不合時宜。
總認為,保釣反日大喊愛國口號並不是什麼有價值的愛國行為。倒不如踏實,做一個安守本份的中國人,學好正確使用筷子吧。
中國是筷子的發源地,是世界上以筷為食的母國,就連老外,也得學會其挑、撥、夾、拌、扒等之法來進食。但遺憾的是,很多華人已懶得去維護自己的餐具,忘了如何正統使用筷子,而這一切,卻是這麼的理所當然。
早陣子的一個飲食節目,堪稱有中醫背景的女主持人,就是一個不會正確使用筷子的人。
這是多麼的諷刺,但又是多麼的可悲。
諷刺,是一個飲食節目連基本功都忽略了。只講求技巧,卻不重視基礎,是現今大部人的毛病。
可悲,是主持人不尊重中國文化、不尊重觀眾。作為傳播媒體,在某程度上也要背上社會責任。
但什麼是責任? 恐怕無人有閒情逸致去關心。
這些接觸點,都是不經意的,但卻能無事化小,小事化大。
以點帶面,就是接觸點的神奇。

魚樂無窮

自出娘胎至今,在跑馬地居住了差不多三份二的時間。其餘皆給予了楓葉國及祖國。今因工作關係,竟搬遷至新界沙田,對於老香港的我,實在有點不習慣。
環境陌生,諸事皆凶。在新居的短短幾個月,我已進出醫院多次。雖然不是迷信之人,但寧可信其有,不可信其無,最終請了一風水大師,指點迷津。
水種植物、銅錢、白醋、熱帶魚、石春、元寶、畫等等,除了魚之外,其他的都易辦。但魚,我實在是一竅不通。為了出入平安,終於鼓起勇氣,跑到去旺角的金魚街,在熙來攘往的人潮裡尋尋覓覓去。
螢光閃閃、林林總總,最終卻換來了花多眼亂。
好不辛苦,找到了落腳點,滿以為任務達成,功成身退,卻事與願違,只因太監不急、急死皇帝。不管我如何明查暗訪,他們都只是隔岸觀火,愛理不理。
一分錢,一分貨,沒辦法。這,就是能要求的服務。
最後,也不願跟自己作對,隨便花了數十元,買了五十條紅蓮燈,一些水草,便匆匆歸家去。
它不入地獄,誰入地獄。二十四小時之後,四十九條壯烈犧牲。
我,黯然神傷。
屢敗屢戰,翌日又跑到金魚街,大開殺戒去。
一朝被蛇咬,十年怕草繩。這所指的,不是養魚的體驗,而是這些魚店所提供的服務。我不敢再到一些觀冕堂皇的魚店,反選擇了一些像已被人遺忘的小店了解情況。沒想到,有意外收獲。從如何把魚放入魚缸,到如何餵飼,店主都悉心教導。最後,我花了數百元,滿戴而歸。
數十元跟數百元,差別只在於服務。

小改變, 大改善

這句簡單的口號,源於一家瑞士的傢俬公司。可是,口號歸口號,行動歸行動。
這家公司說因沒有將運送費用加進成本中,所以售價特別相宜。
此言差矣。
首先,未加進送貨成本的售價已不便宜。假若加進成本,價格更在市場之上。而且,裝嵌又要另加收費。售價相宜?
一點也不見得。反而,他們的價格系統殊不簡單。每項服務,逐項收費。在他們的立場,是絕對的得益。但在客戶的角度看,有云願者上釣,則是見仁見智。
最近,不知犯上什麼毛病,到他們在沙田的旗艦店購買衣櫃。唉… …
天作孽,猶可為。自作孽,不可活。
送貨時間例必虛發,也就算了吧。反正在香港這彈丸之地,送貨準時的公司少之有少。
送貨員態度一般,也能理解。不管工作量多與少,始終是一人負責一家的組裝。這,卻能反公司如何體恤員工。
他們也許不明白到,員工是前線人員,是接觸客人的重要人物。善待員工,得益的永遠是公司。
他們所推出的什麼收舊傢俬,送新傢俬的服務,更是狗屁不通。
這項服務,原來是有機關的 — 只限同類型的產品。
我馬上致電客戶服務熱線,但生硬的制度,根本就沒有完全照護到客人所需!
小改變,大改善 — 他們對客人的承諾。大改變,小改善 — 客人對他們的感覺。

走為上著

辛辛苦苦工作了一星期,求的,大抵只不過是三餐一宿、安樂茶飯而已。
或者,再勤奮賣命多千多個星期,換來的,都是同一個結果 — 勞碌一生、平庸一世。
想要出人頭地,談何容易。正如每家企業的架構一樣,僧多粥少。想要做人上人,必先學好做人做事之術。否則,任你使出平生的所有絕學,皆徒勞無功,還得慘淡收場,血本無歸,身敗名裂。
人生如戲,戲如人生。一切如夢幻泡影、鏡花水月,毋需過份執著矣。
正當我沉思人生之際,頓覺人有三急。此情此境,在大街大巷,又何來地方如廁。
抬頭一看,才驀然發覺,原來自家身處位於銅鑼灣的名店 — 利園。
人在危難時往往不顧一切。有云「大難臨頭各自飛」,更何況我毫無掛慮。
說時遲,那時快,我已跑到第一層。就在不遠處,見到了指示牌,我馬上衝前去。誰知道柳暗花明又一村,過了大門後還須多走一回。跑呀跑到終點,門上卻寫上「商戶專用」!
嗚呼!
也許店就是這樣,恐怕閒人把雅潔的地方弄髒,非不得拒人於千里之外不可。
狗眼看人低,我走為上著,往住好的也!

笑春風

儘管曾在戶外廣告公司打滾了好幾年,但從來就不太相信它的經濟效益。
原因有二,其他廣告媒體的衰落並不代表戶外廣告有絕對的發展空間。始終,傳統的媒體有一定的互動作用。單靠一張海報來跟目標受眾傳遞訊息,效果畢竟有限,其二,消費者愛貪小便宜。此貪代自古有之,非但不會隨時間流逝,卻只會變本加厲。
企業如果想在短期內吸取客戶,還不如多搞一些能馬上給潛在客戶好處的活動。
可是,「未路,未必是沒路」。
這句很有意義的宣傳口號,是最近在火車站的燈箱廣告所見的。而這句口號的目的,是希望幫助感到絕望的人重拾心情,邁步前路。
簡簡單單的幾個字,給了我很大的感受。
「少點認色,多點認識。」
不知哪天在地鐵站被這同音異字深深的吸引著。
或者,我錯了。
或者,我不應帶著有色眼鏡去看戶外媒體,因為我對它還不是十分認識。
選擇用這類媒體去接觸目標受眾固然重要,但更重要的,就是如何去表達內容。
不怕媒體壞,只怕內容差。
有麝自然香,何須春風忙。

身體健康

「你先到地下付款,然後再回來。」
我帶著疲弱的身驅,在緩慢的電梯前呆等,心卻在想,這兒真是名符其實的酒店式運作,竟要在大堂結賬!
電梯終於到了。奇怪的是,這裡並沒有區別客與非客。雖然仍有站立空間,還沒給予沙甸魚的感覺,但這算衛生嘛?
在這裡住了不足八個小時,卻花上我四千多元。看罷賬單,已沒啥心情,但卻無可奈何。說到底,我總算是領會過所謂「酒店式」的服務。
「麻煩你回到四樓去。」
我像是行屍走肉,沒靈魂似的,任由人家擺佈。
再次來到地獄,面對著一班視錢財如命的紅衣魔鬼,愛理不理,我情願一命嗚呼。
未幾,其中一個反正閒著,便敷衍了我,把我接到取藥處。
「付錢了沒?」
什麼?這個喪心病狂的紅衣魔鬼,不是關心我的情況,竟是她自己的工資!
這一刻,我無話可說。而,這家位於沙田的所謂酒店式醫院,實質上是虛偽冷血視病人如無物的吸血鬼!
醫者父母心?
倒不如自求多福,身體健康。

人云亦云

今天是大日子。
男人傳統的「四仔」之中,我多了其一 — 車仔。
從考慮到行動,不需花上半天。精確地說,就只需那三個多小時。雖然投資不多不少 — 首期萬多元、月供六十期每期二千多 —但對於中產的我,在這麼短促的時間內,便作了這個決定,是頗為意外的。
若跟閒時比較,則是天淵之別。我是買一本電腦雜誌也要思前想後、猶疑不決的人。我寧可給人白眼,也誓要站在報攤翻看內頁多次,拿起放低,再看其它的,最終能也就急步離去,免得給人家破口大罵,走為上著。
而今天,竟能這麼瀟洒的「一擲千金」原因離不開兩個 —切實需要,及朋友介紹、或口碑。若沒有需要,除非銷售員有呼風喚雨之法力,否則只是愚公移山,徒勞無功。但如今需求已被肯定,最後能否鐵柱成針,口碑則帶有針引線之威力。
就只因我朋友的推介,便將我「品性易改」,多增一仔也。
古語有云:「一傳十、十傳百」。人云亦云這種效應,比起其它任何一種宣傳工具更為有效。

人言可畏?

三言兩語、長篇大論、廢話連篇、大話西遊、天南地北、竊竊私語、山盟海誓、破口大罵、甜言蜜語、單刀直入、無病呻吟、胡言亂語……
這些,都是溝通。而溝通,是雙方的。
單方面的溝通,算不上是溝通,只能算得上是自言自語、思覺失調。
溝通有不同的工具,包括七情六慾、身體表情、文字詞語等。每一種方式,也給接收者一種體驗。這些體驗,是刻骨銘心、蕩氣迴腸的。但,時代的推移、科技的進步,卻換來了溝通的墮落。
「歡迎致電××行客戶服務熱線。廣東話,請按三字。」
多麼生硬沒靈魂的開場白。若想找個活人對話,則要經過一二三四五六七的選項。就算已過五關、斬六將,也不一定如願以償。
為了控制成本而採用語音溝通雖是無可厚非,但對於客戶來說,就是說不出的無奈與不方便。
人言可畏,卻遠比不上語音可惡。

民以食為天

誰說人情冷暖、世態炎涼?君不見某時某刻還有「士為知己者死,女為悅己者容」的壯觀場面嘛?
從遠處,便能看到一條長長的人龍。目的,就是為了一嚐大快朵頤的芭芙。這種日式小食,製作過程非常簡單,也不需什麼高超烹調技術,更不要經驗豐的大廚操刀。由於整個生產過程都是公開沒保留的,或許只要多加細心留意,與及有神鵰大俠楊過的過目不忘能力,任可人都能發明自己的芭芙。
但消費者是懶惰的,更莫說是否聰明。十元一個芭芙,願意再花上十多分鐘去購買的仍大有人在。
等待的時間,遠短於享用時間。這,絕不是生活在步伐急促的香港人的習慣。
能打破這條規律,究竟是民以食為天,還是人有我有不執輸的心理,都不重要了。反正芭芙是大贏家。
唯獨肯定的是,新不如舊。
新推出的脆筒口感一般,除了忌廉比芭芙多以外,並無特別。
多元化是強化市場份額的其一手段,但倘若產品自身不行,就算有人龍效應,最終也龍變蟲,得不償失矣!

醜人多八怪

這也許是一種社會自然現象。因為醜,所以要弄些新意思,突出自己,以求鶴立雞群,惹人注意。
目標清晰,也容易達到。但效果是否理想,則見仁見智。
今日乘坐公共巴士的時候,在逼不得已的情況下,再次受到「垃圾廣告」的轟炸。垃圾,是因為沒得我同意便強要我接受,如同其它戶外廣告。
四方盒內播於著的,是一個介紹流行手機鈴聲的節目。本來音樂是無國界中立的語言,應較容易接受,那節目主持人……嗚呼!
不知所謂的髮型,儘管是由紅變黑了,但仍是予人煩厭的感覺。眼,為靈魂之窗。髮腳與眉毛只是一線之差,實在搞不清那種模糊關係。可能是這個原因,其眼耳口鼻便無一吸引。殘酷點說,根本就是面目可憎。
這,就可算得上失敗了。
感覺不好,便影響了對這種廣告媒體的看法,繼而推進到對戶外廣告的反感。
體驗,不可小覷。

29 March 2006

一家便宜兩家著

我是一個愛書之人,不但只奉誠「寧可一日無肉,不可一日無書」,篤信「書中自有黃金屋,書中自有顏如玉」。雖然黃金屋仍是遙遙無期,但芳草,總算是落地生根了。

每逄周未,我必到尖沙咀的壹葉堂打書釘。遇到心頭好,便毫不猶疑地掏腰包。現在書架上的書,有七成多都是這樣購回來的。心想,我這算是忠誠的老客戶罷,怎也應該免費得到一張優惠卡,但從來也沒有接受過邀請。

一天,跑到九龍塘的那所分店,竟發現了優惠卡的申請,但卻要在規定時間購買多於一定金額,才有資格成為他們所謂的尊貴會員。我看畢詳情,明白了,揮一揮衣袖,不帶走一片雲彩。

既然不懂尊重老客戶,也就別奢望得到老客戶的忠心。或許,他們就連如何去尋找老客戶的心思也沒有,更別去計較他們的市場計劃,一塌糊塗。

自此,不辭而別。

多得互聯網,世界真細小。

我開始了網上購書的習慣。有得必有失。如果不介意等候時間長,和書本的包裝質量沒有保證外,這未曾不是一個不錯的選擇。

但愛打書釘的我,始終懷念那種溜連在一角的寧靜。最近,又跑到老牌書店商務裡去,追尋失去已久的書香。

跌入花叢,情難自控,但寧缺勿濫,雖再次覓到目標,仍須潔身自愛。說到底,自己不是一個隨便的人。平常買書,也必驗明正身,確保書身潔淨,才將之為己有。

可惜,目標有點書皺,為我所難接受。店員靈機一觸,馬上給我打上八五折。二話不說,揮一揮衣袖,帶走了一片雲彩。而這片雲彩,將會是恆久的。

這,就是客戶關係管理,是人與人之間的接觸點優化成果。

Recruitment Agency - ProJob21

I quit my job at Swire Coca-Cola Hong Kong on 06 December 2005.

It was not a bold decision, because I really have had enough with Kenneth Leung, or my then immediate supervisor. He acted as if he was a nice guy, but everyone in the department knew that he was just a great pretender. Sales dropped significantly since his arrival in November 2004. He attributed the poor results to the bad working attitude of the team heads. However, he’s the department head and he's in charge. Shouldn’t he be the one accountable for the morale of the department? He was just full of non-sense.

Let bygones be bygones.

This was not the first time I resigned from a company. In the last 10 years, I’ve basically worked for more than 15 companies. I’ve learned that the size of company doesn’t really matter. What matters most is your relationship with your immediate supervisor. Even if the company sucks, you can still get job satisfaction as long as your boss appreciates your efforts and supports you all the way.

That’s People Touchpoint!

I didn’t have a job before my resignation. It’s a very risky decision, because I’d end up jobless after my resignation. In fact, that was the case - I was jobless for two months. During these two months, I started to run my own business. I met a lot of business people from both software and training industries, and I learned a lot from our discussions.

“Expect the worst, hope for the best.”

Life without a job is always tough, but somehow I managed to survive. I may not be the fittest, but I just somehow survived.

Still, it’s always to have a job than none, especially when I got no income from the newly start-up business. From friend’s referral, I got my current job with PCCW, a leading telecommunications company in Hong Kong, as a training consultant.

Having been a sales and marketing person for more than 10 years, switching to a totally different field is not easy, but again I managed to survive.

During the jobless days, I contacted a number of recruitment agencies in Hong Kong – ProJob 21, Bo Le, Michael Page, Drake, Robert Walters, and quite a few more. No recruitment agency could offer any useful assistance when I needed them the most. I got the PCCW job not with their help but a referral from a friend.

After I secured the job with PCCW, ProJob 21 and Bo Le called and said they got some good jobs for me.

I usually won’t reject any interesting opportunities. ProJob 21 referred me to interview with AC Nielsen, as an Associate Director.

I passed the first round of interview, with support from ProJob 21. The consultant named Victoria was very helpful in the initial stage, but her attitude changed completely in the second round of the interview, which required me to do a presentation. I emailed my presentation to Victoria for comments. But she never replied, which was within expectation. After all, what do you expect those consultants to do? It’s lucky that they remember you, call you, and ask you if you are interested in blah blah blah… Then after the presentation interview, I waited and waited and waited for the final round.

No calls thereafter.

I called to follow up and they didn’t return call.

They care about you most when they need to submit applications to their clients. When the screening process is done, and some brilliant candidates are being short-listed, then the abandoned candidates are brutally ignored even if they take the initiative to follow up with the interviewing results.

ProJob 21. Victoria. Thank you for giving me hope.

This is one of the worst People Touchpoints I’ve ever had with recruitment agency.

02 March 2006

103 Minibus

I am a usual passenger of 103 minibus, taking me from home every morning to the place I work, and then taking me from office every night to the place I live.

Every day is just another day, and life goes on as usual.

Being a loyal passenger, I have no expectations on 103 minibus. The reason why I have no expectations is not because I am a loyal passenger, but because it is a routine exercise. 103 minibus is the only transportation that will take me office. I have no other choices. 103 minibus is the monopoly in my market. As long as the driver delivers me on-time to the office every day, then I would not have any complaints.

But good things won't last forever.

The incident didn't affect me, but it bothered me.

I was already on the minibus, and not far away, a couple with a baby in the baby stroller standing on the double yellow lines wanted to get on the minibus. It is illegal for minibuses to pick up or drop off passengers in restricted areas marked with double yellow lines, but that minibus driver took the risk and let the family get on the bus.

The weather was cold, and folded up the baby stroller took time. The driver lost patience and complained about the family. He told the family not to get on the minibus in restricted areas next time.

Wait a minute.

He was the one who parked the minibus and took the risk to let the family get on, but now he was the one to complain.

This is just not right.

Although I have no expectations on the minibus services, it does not mean that I do not have expectations on the attitude of the driver.

What exactly am I consuming from the minibus?
- Timeliness: On schedule and on time without having to wait for ages
- Comfort / Safety: Smooth and stable along the journey with no sharp turns and stops
- Cleanliness: Environment inside the minibus
- Attitude: Be nice, patience and caring
Am I really asking too much for a HK$8 trip? Am I being too unreasonable?
My expectation is not really hard to manage.
Timeliness: There is a schedule for the minibus to follow. The schedule will only be disturbed if there is traffic conjestion or accident, which is then out of the control of the minibus driver, and is understandable.
Comfort / Safety: Practice makes perfect. It is only the basic requirement.
Cleanliness: It is again the basic requirement, unless there are some irresponsible passengers which will require the driver extra efforts to clean the minibus after every trip.
Attitude: This is the root cause of the previous three criteria, or what is known as "Deliverables Touchpoint" in TXM, where attitude is "People Touchpoint".
Every experience is dictated by the People Touchpoint.

Thoughts on Supply Chain Management

The JITD program was supposed to tackle the uneven distribution workload Barilla encountered with its distributors. In order to achieve this, better demand forecast was needed with the support of the distributors.

Benefits of the program are below.
- Barilla’s own logistics organization would be allowed to specify the appropriate delivery quantities that would more effectively meet the end consumer’s needs
- It would also allow Barilla to distribute the workload on manufacturing and logistics systems more evenly

Drawbacks of the program are below.
- Higher investment costs such as training
- Since JITD is a new concept, and has not tried out before, there is a risk that serious errors may occur during the implementation process, and this would ruin all previous efforts

The value chain consists of five major components, and it can be represented as SIPOC, where S is Supplier, I Input, P Production, O Output and C Customer.

Between C and P, there are also the distributors, wholesalers and retailers.

It is almost impossible to develop an accurate sales forecast because the market is constantly changing. Factors affecting the market situation are also changing. Without an accurate sales forecast, it is difficult to achieve JIT. This is basically a paradox. No enterprise is able to develop an accurate sales forecast, and without an accurate sales forecast, it is not possible to achieve JIT. Is there really no way out? How about Dell? Dell basically builds computers on a BTO (build-to-order) basis, and this makes JIT possible. But how many enterprises can really deliver products on a BTO basis? What are the requirements to produce on a BTO basis? Barilla definitely was not one of them.

Communication here is the critical success factor. The supplier, in this case, Barilla, has to collect information from the distributor, and the distributor has to be able to collect information from the wholesaler, and then the wholesaler has to do the same from the retailer. It is basically a communication network, or the communication system. If the chain breaks down, then basically the communication system is not going to work. Data integrity is also important. Even if the communication system works out smooth, but if the data quality is poor, it is also not going to work.

Standardization is then one of the ways to tackle inconsistency and also to improve transparency.

Resistance to accept changes is also another major obstacle in the implementation of any new concepts. It is human nature not to take risk. If the existing system works perfectly well, why should the new system be in place? And if the old system does not work, why not fix the old system instead of coming up with a new system? What benefits and values can the new system bring to the enterprise? And how can the enterprise be sure that the new system can deliver the benefits and values as promised, given the new system has not even been put into use?

Trust is therefore another hindrance to the implementation of any new ideas. The concept has to be communicated clearly within the organization, and it is necessary to make sure that each affected party understands why the new concept is being introduced, and how each individual is going to benefit from the introduction of the concept. There should be a reason for any idea to exist. Why does an individual need it? Without trust, nothing can be achieved. It is also important to make sure that everyone should feel a sense of ownership of the concept. Although imagination is more important than knowledge according to Albert Einstein, conversation without communication ruins good imagination.

In Barilla’s case, it is obvious that the above problems all existed during the implementation of JITD.

If I were Giorgio Maggiali, I would try to manage touchpoint experience, a concept that I developed some years ago.

After all, in order to deliver results, it is not only about strategy and planning, but it is also about execution, and it has to be done by people.

People are always the root problem, and this explains why people management is so important.

Touchpoint is all communication from start to completion. Experience is a subjective feeling that once expectation is met the experience is positive.

In order to make sure that the JITD program can be implemented successfully, I’d run the program first by pilot. I’d explain clearly about the problems that both Barilla and the distributors might be facing, and then select the distributor who has faith in the concept, and then roll out the pilot program with the chosen distributor. In order to ensure its success, I may also introduce some incentive program, where the incentive would only be given if the expected results are delivered. When the pilot is done with success, I’d share the results with all other distributors. Meeting would be held on a regular basis to keep every distributor informed of the progress.

Internally, I’d also hold meetings on a regular basis. But before the regular meetings, I’d gain support from all department heads. I’d make sure that every one in the organization has a sense of ownership of the idea. The success of the JITD program is not mine but ours!

Individual hero does not work anymore in today’s business environment but teammates.